Combination of Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis and Rank Order Centroid in Supplier Performance Evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v4i4.1677Keywords:
Combination; Evaluation; MAIRCA; ROC Weighting; Supplier PerformanceAbstract
Supplier performance evaluation is a critical aspect of supply chain management that focuses on assessing and monitoring the performance of suppliers. Supplier performance evaluation not only provides benefits for the company, but also motivates suppliers to improve their quality standards and operational efficiency. This study aims to evaluate supplier performance based on existing assessment data by applying the ROC method to determine the weight of the criteria used, then the MAIRCA method will evaluate supplier performance so that it will produce a rating of supplier performance evaluation which will be a decision recommendation for companies in assessing the performance of existing suppliers. The combination of ROC and MAIRCA weighting methods forms a powerful approach in addressing the complexity and challenges of multi-criteria decision making. ROC with its focus on relative ranking criteria, whereas MAIRCA which considers the difference between ideal and real conditions, presents complementary perspectives. By combining the two, decision makers can generate a more contextual and informational weight of criteria. The ranking result graph in figure 4 shows the best supplier performance obtained on behalf of Supplier C with a final value of 0.052391944 ranked 1, then on behalf of Supplier F with a final value of 0.050077222 ranked 2, and on behalf of Supplier G with a final value of 0.049074028 ranked 3.
Downloads
References
W. C. Benton, C. Prahinski, and Y. Fan, “The influence of supplier development programs on supplier performance,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 230, p. 107793, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107793.
M. Giannakis, R. Dubey, I. Vlachos, and Y. Ju, “Supplier sustainability performance evaluation using the analytic network process,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 247, p. 119439, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119439.
D. M. Utama, T. Baroto, M. F. Ibrahim, and D. S. Widodo, “Evaluation of Supplier Performance in Plastic Manufacturing Industry: A Case Study,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1845, no. 1, p. 012016, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1845/1/012016.
L. Tong, Z. Pu, K. Chen, and J. Yi, “Sustainable maintenance supplier performance evaluation based on an extend fuzzy PROMETHEE II approach in petrochemical industry,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 273, p. 122771, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122771.
S. S. Co?kun, M. Kumru, and N. M. Kan, “An integrated framework for sustainable supplier development through supplier evaluation based on sustainability indicators,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 335, p. 130287, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130287.
I. M. Jiskani, Q. Cai, W. Zhou, X. Lu, and S. A. A. Shah, “An integrated fuzzy decision support system for analyzing challenges and pathways to promote green and climate smart mining,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 188, p. 116062, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116062.
M. Deveci, A. R. Mishra, I. Gokasar, P. Rani, D. Pamucar, and E. Özcan, “A decision support system for assessing and prioritizing sustainable urban transportation in metaverse,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 475–484, 2022.
F. S. Amalia, “Application of SAW Method in Decision Support System for Determination of Exemplary Students,” J. Inf. Technol. Softw. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–21, 2023.
H. Sulistiani, Setiawansyah, P. Palupiningsih, F. Hamidy, P. L. Sari, and Y. Khairunnisa, “Employee Performance Evaluation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) with PIPRECIA-S Weighting: A Case Study in Education Institution,” in 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS), 2023, pp. 369–373. doi: 10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349017.
Setiawansyah, A. A. Aldino, P. Palupiningsih, G. F. Laxmi, E. D. Mega, and I. Septiana, “Determining Best Graduates Using TOPSIS with Surrogate Weighting Procedures Approach,” in 2023 International Conference on Networking, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (IConNECT), 2023, pp. 60–64. doi: 10.1109/IConNECT56593.2023.10327119.
S. Hadian, E. Shahiri Tabarestani, and Q. B. Pham, “Multi attributive ideal-real comparative analysis (MAIRCA) method for evaluating flood susceptibility in a temperate Mediterranean climate,” Hydrol. Sci. J., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 401–418, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1080/02626667.2022.2027949.
S. Chakraborty, P. Chatterjee, and P. P. Das, “Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA) Method,” in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Manufacturing Environments, Apple Academic Press, 2024, pp. 289–296.
D. D. Trung and H. X. Thinh, “A multi-criteria decision-making in turning process using the MAIRCA, EAMR, MARCOS and TOPSIS methods: A comparative study,” Adv. Prod. Eng. Manag., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 443–456, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.14743/apem2021.4.412.
D. Handoko, “Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Pemilihan Kostan Menggunakan Multi-Atributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA),” Chain J. Comput. Technol. Comput. Eng. Informatics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2024.
M. MARUF and K. ÖZDEM?R, “Ranking of Tourism Web Sites According to Service Performance Criteria with CRITIC and MAIRCA Methods: The Case of Turkey,” Uluslararas? Yönetim Akad. Derg., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1108–1117, 2024.
M. Gul and M. F. Ak, “Assessment of occupational risks from human health and environmental perspectives: a new integrated approach and its application using fuzzy BWM and fuzzy MAIRCA,” Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1231–1262, 2020.
F. Ecer, A. Böyükaslan, and S. Hashemkhani Zolfani, “Evaluation of Cryptocurrencies for Investment Decisions in the Era of Industry 4.0: A Borda Count-Based Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Extensions EDAS-MAIRCA-MARCOS Multi-Criteria Methodology,” Axioms, vol. 11, no. 8, p. 404, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/axioms11080404.
M. C. J. Anand, K. Kalaiarasi, N. Martin, B. Ranjitha, S. S. Priyadharshini, and M. Tiwari, “Fuzzy C-Means Clustering with MAIRCA-MCDM Method in Classifying Feasible Logistic Suppliers of Electrical Products,” in 2023 First International Conference on Cyber Physical Systems, Power Electronics and Electric Vehicles (ICPEEV), 2023, pp. 1–7.
M. O. Esangbedo, J. Xue, S. Bai, and C. O. Esangbedo, “Relaxed Rank Order Centroid Weighting MCDM Method With Improved Grey Relational Analysis for Subcontractor Selection: Photothermal Power Station Construction,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 2022, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2022.3204629.
I. Oktaria, “Kombinasi Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Pemilihan Kegiatan Ekstrakulikuler,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023.
N. A. Mohamad, N. H. M. Desa, and M. M. Kasim, “Poverty index development by using rank order centroid and simple additive weighting method,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2023, vol. 2896, no. 1.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Combination of Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis and Rank Order Centroid in Supplier Performance Evaluation
ARTICLE HISTORY
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Waqas Arshad, Setiawansyah, Mesran, Desyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
