Penerapan Multi-Atributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis dan PIPRECIA Dalam Evaluasi Kinerja Pemasok Bahan Baku
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v4i4.1652Keywords:
Evaluation; Performance; MAIRCA; Valuation; PIPRECIAAbstract
Performance evaluation of raw material suppliers is a systematic process carried out by companies to measure and monitor supplier performance in supplying the necessary raw materials. Through continuous evaluation, companies can improve the effectiveness of supplier management strategies, identify opportunities for improvement, and build long-term, mutually beneficial relationships. Performance evaluation of raw material suppliers is the main instrument in maintaining supply chain integrity and ensuring the sustainability of company operations. This process involves assessing various aspects, including the quality of raw materials, timeliness of delivery, compliance with ethical and environmental standards, and efficiency in logistics processes. The problem that occurs in performance evaluation is that there is no application of a decision support system model that can evaluate the performance of raw material suppliers, the process so far carried out in evaluating the performance of raw material suppliers only assesses the criteria in the assessment of supplier performance evaluation. This study aims to evaluate the performance of raw material suppliers by applying the Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA) method and Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA). The final value of supplier performance evaluation is the overall result of the appraisal process carried out by a company on its suppliers. In this process, various aspects of supplier performance are evaluated using predetermined methods, the PIPRECIA method for weighting criteria and MAIRCA for supplier performance evaluation calculations. The results of the evaluation of the performance of raw material suppliers show the results for the best 1 with a final value of 0.352 obtained by Tanjung Raja suppliers, the best 2 with a final value of 0.333 obtained by CV Tri Sakti suppliers, the best 3 with a final value of 0.315 obtained by Abadi Makmur suppliers.
Downloads
References
T. G. Hawkins, M. J. Gravier, and W. A. Muir, “The role of supplier performance evaluations in mitigating risk: Assessing evaluation processes and behaviors,” Ind. Mark. Manag., vol. 87, pp. 2–17, 2020.
M. E. Bili?ik, N. Ça?lar, and Ö. N. A. Bili?ik, “A comparative performance analyze model and supplier positioning in performance maps for supplier selection and evaluation,” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci., vol. 58, pp. 1434–1442, 2012.
D. M. Utama, T. Baroto, M. F. Ibrahim, and D. S. Widodo, “Evaluation of Supplier Performance in Plastic Manufacturing Industry: A Case Study,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, vol. 1845, no. 1, p. 12016.
H. Sulistiani, Setiawansyah, P. Palupiningsih, F. Hamidy, P. L. Sari, and Y. Khairunnisa, “Employee Performance Evaluation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) with PIPRECIA-S Weighting: A Case Study in Education Institution,” in 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS), 2023, pp. 369–373. doi: 10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349017.
Setiawansyah, A. A. Aldino, P. Palupiningsih, G. F. Laxmi, E. D. Mega, and I. Septiana, “Determining Best Graduates Using TOPSIS with Surrogate Weighting Procedures Approach,” in 2023 International Conference on Networking, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (IConNECT), 2023, pp. 60–64. doi: 10.1109/IConNECT56593.2023.10327119.
D. Handoko, “Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Pemilihan Kostan Menggunakan Multi-Atributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA),” Chain J. Comput. Technol. Comput. Eng. Informatics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2024.
S. Hadian, E. Shahiri Tabarestani, and Q. B. Pham, “Multi attributive ideal-real comparative analysis (MAIRCA) method for evaluating flood susceptibility in a temperate Mediterranean climate,” Hydrol. Sci. J., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 401–418, 2022.
S. Chakraborty, P. Chatterjee, and P. P. Das, “Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA) Method,” in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Manufacturing Environments, Apple Academic Press, 2024, pp. 289–296.
M. MARUF and K. ÖZDEM?R, “Ranking of Tourism Web Sites According to Service Performance Criteria with CRITIC and MAIRCA Methods: The Case of Turkey,” Uluslararas? Yönetim Akad. Derg., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1108–1117, 2024.
A. Q. Maharani and T. Ardiansah, “Kombinasi Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory dan Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment Dalam Penentuan Lulusan Terbaik,” J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2074–2086, 2023.
H. B. Santoso, “Metode Pembobotan Simplified Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment dan COPRAS Dalam Penentuan Seleksi Penerimaan Guru,” J. Artif. Intell. Technol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 154–163, 2023.
D. Stanujkic, D. Karabasevic, G. Popovic, and C. Sava, “Simplified pivot pairwise relative criteria importance assessment (PIPRECIA-S) method,” Rom. J. Econ. Forecast., vol. 24, no. 4, p. 141, 2021.
S. H. Hadad et al., “Student Ranking Based on Learning Assessment Using the Simplified PIPRECIA Method and CoCoSo Method,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 5, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v5i1.4544.
A. Blagojevi?, Ž. Stevi?, D. Marinkovi?, S. Kasalica, and S. Rajili?, “A novel entropy-fuzzy PIPRECIA-DEA model for safety evaluation of railway traffic,” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 9, p. 1479, 2020.
Q. Q. Qaddoori and H. K. Breesam, “Using the Pivot Pair-Wise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA) Method to Determine the Relative Weight of the Factors Affecting Construction Site Safety Performance.,” Int. J. Saf. Secur. Eng., vol. 13, no. 1, 2023.
S. Sudha and N. Martin, “Comparative analysis of Plithogenic neutrosophic PIPRECIA over neutrosophic AHP in criteria ordering of logistics selection,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2023, vol. 2649, no. 1.
A. Uluta?, A. Topal, D. Karabasevic, D. Stanujkic, G. Popovic, and F. Smarandache, “Prioritization of logistics risks with plithogenic PIPRECIA method,” in International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2021, pp. 663–670.
D. E. H. Purnomo and Y. A. Sunardiansyah, “Implementasi Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Untuk Evaluasi Pemasok Kayu Pada Industri Furnitur,” JISO J. Ind. Syst. Optim., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021.
T. P. Adhiana, M. Krisnawati, and H. Asyari, “Evaluasi Kinerja Pemasok Bahan Baku Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Promethee,” Din. Rekayasa, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 107, 2019.
R. R. Oprasto, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pemasok Bahan Baku Menggunakan Metode PROMETHEE,” J. Media Celeb., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 2023.
S. Proboningrum and A. Sidauruk, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Kain Dengan Metode Moora,” JSiI (Jurnal Sist. Informasi), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 2021.
I. ?ali?, Ž. Stevi?, C. Karamasa, and A. Puška, “A novel integrated fuzzy PIPRECIA–interval rough SAW model: Green supplier selection,” Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 126–145, 2020.
S.-S. Mortezaeipooya, P.-S. Ashofteh, and P. Golfam, “Selecting the best approach to modeling the performance of water supply system using the combination of rough set theory with multi-criteria decision making,” Water Resour. Manag., vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 3129–3152, 2022.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Penerapan Multi-Atributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis dan PIPRECIA Dalam Evaluasi Kinerja Pemasok Bahan Baku
ARTICLE HISTORY
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Donaya Pasha, Mudar Safi, Setiawansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
