Optimalisasi Teknologi Tepat Guna Berbasis Microsoft Office untuk Meningkatkan Efisiensi dan Transparansi Penilaian Lomba Cerdas Cermat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47065/jpm.v7i1.3401Keywords:
Appropriate Technology; Community Digital Literacy; Organizing Committee Empowerment; Participatory Action Research; Quiz CompetitionAbstract
The scoring for the Quiz Competition (LCC), which is still done manually, often slows down the tallying of scores, leads to recording errors, and ultimately reduces the transparency of the results in the eyes of the contestants. This issue was also identified among the LCC organizing committee in Kotabaru Village, Cibeureum Subdistrict, Tasikmalaya City, which has long relied on manual score recording without the support of an integrated operational system. Based on this background, this community service project aims to improve operational efficiency and the transparency of LCC scoring through the implementation of simple Appropriate Technology (TTG), while also strengthening the technical capacity of the committee members as project partners. The partners involved consist of 11 LCC committee members, including the chairperson, competition coordinator, judges, moderator, presentation operator, and score operator. This activity used a single-cycle Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach that included the planning, action and observation, and reflection stages, utilizing Microsoft PowerPoint as a medium for presenting timed questions and Microsoft Excel as an automated scoring system. Data collection was conducted through pretest-post-test assessments, a self-efficacy questionnaire, an implementation observation sheet, a practical skills assessment sheet, and an empowerment evaluation questionnaire. The results of the community service program showed an increase in the committee members’ technical knowledge, with an average N-Gain of 0.79—which falls into the high category—accompanied by an increase in self-efficacy with an N-Gain of 0.64 in the moderate category. Score tabulation also became much faster, from a manual estimate of 10 to 15 minutes to less than 2 minutes per round, while the operators’ practical skills reached an average of 88.75% and the committee members’ perception of empowerment stood at 87.6%, falling into the very high category. These results indicate that simple TTG is effective in strengthening the capacity of community committees in a self-reliant and sustainable manner.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, M. S. A. M., Aizuddin, A. N., & Abdul Manaf, M. R. (2025). The impact of provider’s quality of information system on user satisfaction and perceived net benefits in Malaysian public hospitals. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 32, 108–121. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms-12-2024-952
Andriyani, Tiyasari, S., Rahmawati, L., Nurvitasari, I., & Jusiputri, N. (2024). Pelatihan literasi digital Karang Taruna Desa Sriharjo. EJOIN: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(1), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.55681/ejoin.v2i1.2245
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Tasikmalaya. (2026). Diambil dari Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Tasikmalaya website: https://tasikmalayakota.bps.go.id/id/publication/2026/02/27/0c02524b4b14c1dd17c34726/kota-tasikmalaya-dalam-angka-2026.html
Balazon, M. W., Iserio, J. M. B., Bembo, R. M. S., & Ramos, R. A. (2025). Flexi: A comprehensive event tabulation system for Pangasinan State University Alaminos City Campus. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(2), 3444–3448. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9020268
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bierer, S. B., Beck Dallaghan, G., Borges, N. J., Brondfield, S., Fung, C. C., Huggett, K. N., & Colbert, C. Y. (2025). Moving beyond simplistic research design in health professions education: What a one-group pretest-posttest design will not prove. MedEdPORTAL, 21. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11527
Cho, H., Wong, Z., & Chiu, W. (2020). The effect of volunteer management on intention to continue volunteering: A mediating role of job satisfaction of volunteers. SAGE Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020920588
Choudhary, H., & Bansal, N. (2022). Addressing digital divide through digital literacy training programs: A systematic literature review. Digital Education Review, 41, 224–248. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2022.41.224-248
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Effendy, C., Purnamaningsih, S. E., Margaret, M., & Probandari, A. (2022). The utility of participatory action research in the nursing field: A scoping review. Creative Nursing, 28(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1891/CN-2021-0021
Enoch, L. C., Abraham, R. M., & Singaram, V. S. (2022). A comparative analysis of the impact of online, blended, and face-to-face learning on medical students’ clinical competency in the affective, cognitive, and psychomotor domains. BMC Medical Education, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03777-x
Fatah Hidayat, A., Hilman, A., Dodi Hidayat, D., & Herniati, N. (2022). Policy brief: Pemekaran Kelurahan Kotabaru Kecamatan Cibeureum Kota Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Inspirasi, 13(1), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.35880/inspirasi.v13i1.1975
Grani?, A. (2022). Educational technology adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 9725–9744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hidayah, N. A., Fetrina, E., & Taufan, A. Z. (2020). Model satisfaction users measurement of academic information system using EUCS method. Applied Information System and Management, 3(2), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.15408/aism.v3i2.14516
Kaiser, I., Pfahlberg, A. B., Mathes, S., Uter, W., Diehl, K., Steeb, T., … Gefeller, O. (2023). Inter-rater agreement in assessing risk of bias in melanoma prediction studies using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST): Results from a controlled experiment on the effect of specific rater training. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(5), 1976. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051976
Kelley, T. R., Knowles, J. G., Holland, J. D., & Han, J. (2020). Increasing high school teachers’ self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice. International Journal of STEM Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00211-w
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer.
Lee, H., Lim, J. A., & Nam, H. K. (2022). Effect of a digital literacy program on older adults’ digital social behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12404. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912404
Ma, Q., Chan, A. H. S., & Teh, P. L. (2020). Bridging the digital divide for older adults via observational training. Sustainability, 12(11), 4555. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114555
Nathan, S. S., Berahim, M., & Ramle, R. (2017). Rubric for measuring psychomotor and affective learning domain. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 25(Special Issue), 101–108.
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
Nursita, L., Astina, A., Isakasari, I., & Amiruddin, I. (2021). Efektivitas penggunaan Microsoft Excel dalam pengolahan nilai rapor siswa SMA Negeri 11 Bone. Educational Leadership: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24252/edu.v1i1.21994
Nyman, A., Rutberg, S., Lilja, M., & Isaksson, G. (2022). The process of using participatory action research when trying out an ICT solution in home-based rehabilitation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221084791
Panagiotopoulos, P., Klievink, B., & Cordella, A. (2019). Public value creation in digital government. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101421
Purba, Y. P., & Elyakim, V. A. E. (2026). Efektivitas lomba cerdas cermat dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar. ABDIKAN, 5(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.55123/abdikan.v5i2.7878
Rahadyan, A., Kurniawan, I., & Abdillah, R. (2022). Using Microsoft Excel in recapitulating student scores for primary teachers. Jurnal Gramaswara: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 2(2), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.gramaswara.2022.002.02.03
Rahmat, A., & Mirnawati, M. (2020). Model participation action research dalam pemberdayaan masyarakat. AKSARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 6(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.37905/aksara.6.1.62-71.2020
Rumsey, M., Stowers, P., Sam, H., Neill, A., Rodrigues, N., Brooks, F., & Daly, J. (2022). Development of PARcific approach: Participatory action research methodology for collectivist health research. Qualitative Health Research, 32(8), 1260–1274. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221092350
Veritia, V., Hermawati, R., Handayani, R., Astuti, E. P., & Suraya, A. (2020). Pelatihan daring Microsoft: Excel dan PowerPoint pada siswa/i SMAN 10 Tangerang Selatan. Integritas: Jurnal Pengabdian, 4(2). Diambil dari https://garuda.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/documents/detail/2136364
Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, X., Duan, H., & Zhang, L. (2022). How sports event volunteer management affects volunteers’ satisfaction and engagement. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221101036
Yasar, M., Foo, J., & Idris, N. D. M. (2025). Appropriate technology: Concept evolution and development direction. JATAED: Journal of Appropriate Technology for Agriculture, Environment, and Development, 3(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.62671/jataed.v3i1.91
Zhou, L., Xue, S., & Li, R. (2022). Extending the technology acceptance model to explore students’ intention to use an online education platform at a university in China. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221085259
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Optimalisasi Teknologi Tepat Guna Berbasis Microsoft Office untuk Meningkatkan Efisiensi dan Transparansi Penilaian Lomba Cerdas Cermat
ARTICLE HISTORY
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Azizah Tohiroh, Irfan Kamaludin Syam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).












