Pengaruh Karakteristik Perusahaan Dan Komite Audit dalam Pemilihan Kantor Akuntan Publik
Pemilihan Kantor Akuntan Publik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47065/arbitrase.v4i2.1048Keywords:
Total Assets Turnover; Company Complexity; Company Growth; Diversity of Audit Committee Members; Selection of Public Accounting FirmsAbstract
Companies have several important considerations when determining which public accounting firm (KAP) will audit their financial statements. The company definitely wants to ensure that the KAP chosen has a good reputation and is credible, thus providing confidence that the audit will be carried out with professionalism and integrity. With the experience and expertise of the KAP, it is expected that the KAP will have an in-depth understanding of industry conditions and applicable accounting requirements, and can provide added value in auditing financial statements. This study aims to determine the factors that influence the company in the selection of KAP Big Four and Non Big Four. The population used in this research is all companies going public on the IDX in 2020-2022. The sample selection was carried out using purposive sampling, and 2,040 data were collected. By using multiple logistic regression, the results show that total assets turnover, company complexity, and the diversity of audit committee members affect the likelihood of a company choosing the Big Four KAP. On the other hand, the company's growth has no effect on the possibility that the company will choose the Big Four KAP.
Downloads
References
Asmara, R. Y. 2019. Effect of Complexity, Due Professional Care, and Auditor Ethics On Audit Quality. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(12), 18–25. www.eprajournals.com
Budiandru. 2021. Factors Affecting the Audit Quality of Pandemic Era Public Accountants. Akuntabel 18 (2), 2021 284-294 http://journal.feb.unmul.ac.id/index.php/AKUNTABEL
Chen, Y. S., Yang, C. C., & Yang, Y. F. 2020. Higher Academic Qualifications, Professional Training, and Operating Performance of Audit Firms. Sustainability, 12(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031254
Choudhary, P. 2018. Who is Responsible for Ensuring a High-quality Audit that Achieves Accurate Financial Reporting? Maandblad Voor Accountancy En Bedrijfseconomie, 92(8), 201–203. https://doi.org/10.5117/mab.92.29989
Dinha, T. T. L., & Dob, D. T. 2020. Determinants Influencing the Quality of Accounting Service: The Case of Accounting Service Firms in Hanoi, Vietnam. Management Science Letters, 10, 675-682.
Dunne, N. J., Brennan, N. M., & Kirwan, C. E. 2020. Impression Management and Big Four Auditors: Scrutiny at a Public Inquiry. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.101170.
Griffith,E.E. 2019. Auditors, Specialists, and Professional Jurisdiction in Audits of Fair Values. Contemporary Accounting Research 37 (1): 245-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12506.
Joe, J., Wu Y.J., and Zimmerman A.B. 2019. Improving the Integration of Expert Advice in Cross-Functional Team Collaboration in Auditing: The Influence of Expert Perspective Taking. Working Paper, University of Delaware Texas Tech University, and Florida State University.
Lee, Eugenia Y., Wonsuk Ha, Sunyoung Park. 2023. Auditor Specialization in R&D and Clients’ R&D Investment-q Sensitivity.
Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics. Volume 19, Issue 2, August 2023, 100360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2023.100360.
Francis, Jere R. 2023. Going Big, Going Small: A Perspective on Strategies for Researching Audit Quality. The British Accounting Review Volume 55, Issue 2, March 2023, 101167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101167.
Giles, C. 2019. Regulator Calls for Law Change to End Big Four Dominance of UK Auditing. The Financial Times (April 17). Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/4219750e-612a-11e9-a27a-fdd51850994c.
Hardiningsih, P., Januarti, I., Oktaviani, R. M., Srimindarti, C., & Udin, U. 2019. Determinants of Audit Quality: An Empirical Insight from Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(7), 570–578
Khasharmeh, H., & Desoky, A.M. 2018. Does the Provision of Non-Audit Services Affect Auditor Independence and Audit Quality? Evidence from Bahrain. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 14(1), 25-55.
Klomp, Jeroen Klomp. 2022. Defending Election Victory by Attacking Company Revenues: The Impact of Elections on the International Defense Industry. European Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102431.
Nagy, Albert L. , Matthew G. Sherwood , Aleksandra B. 2023. Zimmerma. CPAs and Big 4 Office Audit Quaity. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. Volume 42, Issue 2, March–April 2023, 107018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2022.107018.
Nolder, C. J., & Kadous, K. 2018. Grounding the Professional Skepticism Construct in Mindset and Attitude Theory: A Way Forward. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 67, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.010
Ocak, M., Kablan, A., & Dursun, G. D. 2020. Does Multiple Auditing Clients Affiliate with the Same Business Group Reduce Audit Quality? Evidence from an Emerging Market. Borsa Istanbul Review, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.06.001
Paisey, C., & Paisey, N. J. 2020. Protecting the Public Interest? Continuing Professional Development Policies and Role-profession Conflict in Accountancy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 67(68), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.04.002
Quick, R. 2020. The Audit Expectation Gap: A Review of the Academic Literature. Maandblad Voor Accountancy En Bedrijfseconomie, 94(2), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.5117/mab.94.47895
Xiao, T., Geng, C., & Yuan, C. 2020. How Audit Effort Affects Audit Quality: An Audit Process and Audit Output Perspective. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13(1), 109 –127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2020.02.002
Yulianti, Nova & Henri Agustin, S. T. 2019. Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Kompleksitas Audit, Risiko Perusahaan, dan Ukuran KAP Terhadap Fee Audit. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 1(1), 217–235.
Zhemchugova, Oksana, Violetta Levshina, Lev Levshin. 2022. Application of Risk-Based Approach Methods of Various Levels of Complexity in the Quality Management System of a Transport Company. Transportation Research Procedia. Volume 63, 2022, Pages 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.05.001.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Pengaruh Karakteristik Perusahaan Dan Komite Audit dalam Pemilihan Kantor Akuntan Publik
ARTICLE HISTORY
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Stefani Lily Indarto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
