Integrasi data Protein-Protein Interactions dan Pathway untuk Menentukan Score pada pathway Menggunakan Analisis Graf
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v3i6.932Keywords:
Module; Multipartite Graph; Orthologue; Pathway Score; Protein-Protein Interactions (PPIs)Abstract
The development of molecular biology technology produces large amounts of omics data. Integration of omics data is useful for the analysis of biological processes at the molecular level, such as protein expression, drug mechanisms against diseases, and mechanisms of inheritance. This study aims to integrate protein molecular biology data through protein-protein interactions (PPIs), pathways, modules and orthology, to calculate pathway scores. The score calculation uses the degree calculation on the graph concept. Proteins, pathways, modules and orthologs act as nodes, while the interactions between them act as edges. Furthermore, according to the concept of a graph, nodes with a high degree represent nodes that have an important role in a graph. Based on this concept, the most important pathway related to a protein is the pathway with the highest degree in a multipartite graph formed by PPIs, modules, orthologs and pathways. The output of this study is a package in the R language to integrate data on molecular biology of proteins, pathways, modules and orthology, then displays the pathways that have the most role in protein based on the order of the highest score. This package was tested using protein Insulin (INS) and Xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH) inputs. The results of calculating the score on the pathway for INS produced the pathway with the highest score, namely MAPK signaling pathway (0.18) lane 1, Pathways in cancer (0.137) lane 2, Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis (0.28) lane 3. XDH protein input produces Purine metabolism pathway (0.67) lane 1, Metabolic pathways (0.48) lane 2 and Purine metabolism (0.23) lane 3. These results can be used for enrichment analysis regarding the relationship between proteins and pathways.
Downloads
References
A. Srivastava and A. Naik, “Big Data Analysis in Bioinformatics,” Adv. Bioinformatics, vol. 2021, pp. 405–429, 2021.
J. Gauthier, A. T. Vincent, S. J. Charette, and N. Derome, “A brief history of bioinformatics,” Brief. Bioinform., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1981–1996, Nov. 2019.
M. C. Schatz et al., “Inverting the model of genomics data sharing with the NHGRI Genomic Data Science Analysis, Visualization, and Informatics Lab-space,” Cell Genomics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2022.
D. Szklarczyk et al., “The STRING database in 2017: Quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 45, no. D1, pp. D362–D368, 2017.
S. Kim et al., “PubChem 2019 update: Improved access to chemical data,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 47, no. D1, pp. D1102–D1109, 2019.
M. Kanehisa, M. Furumichi, M. Tanabe, Y. Sato, and K. Morishima, “KEGG: New perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 45, no. D1, pp. D353–D361, 2017.
Y. Gui and X. Wang, “Application of K-nearest neighbors in protein-protein interaction prediction,” Highlights Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 2, pp. 125–131, 2022.
A. Fadli, W. A. Kusuma, Annisa, I. Batubara, and R. Heryanto, “Screening of potential Indonesia herbal compounds based on multi-label classification for 2019 coronavirus disease,” Big Data Cogn. Comput., vol. 5, no. 4, 2021.
D. Lamparter, D. Marbach, R. Rueedi, Z. Kutalik, and S. Bergmann, “Fast and Rigorous Computation of Gene and Pathway Scores from SNP-Based Summary Statistics,” PLoS Comput. Biol., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2016.
S. Kitsiranuwat, A. Suratanee, and K. Plaimas, “Multi-data aspects of protein similarity with a learning technique to identify drug-disease associations,” Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 7, p. 2914, Apr. 2021.
W. Zhang, F. Li, L. Nie, and W. Zhang WeiwenZhang, “Integrating multiple ‘omics’ analysis for microbial biology: application and methodologies.”
P. S. Nugroho, N. A. Tianingrum, S. Sunarti, A. Rachman, D. S. Fahrurodzi, and R. Amiruddin, “Predictor risk of diabetes mellitus in Indonesia, based on national health survey,” Malaysian J. Med. Heal. Sci., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 126–130, 2020.
R. Afnuhazi, “Faktor - Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Kejadian Asam Urat Pada Lansia (45 – 70 Tahun),” Hum. Care J., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 34, 2019.
G. Ginde et al., “ScientoBASE: a framework and model for computing scholastic indicators of non-local influence of journals via native data acquisition algorithms,” Scientometrics, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 1479–1529, 2016.
A. Jain and B. V. R. Reddy, “Optimal degree centrality based algorithm for cluster head selection in wireless sensor networks,” 2014 Recent Adv. Eng. Comput. Sci. RAECS 2014, pp. 6–8, 2014.
Z. Huang et al., “Network Pharmacology Approach to Uncover the Mechanism Governing the Effect of Simiao Powder on Knee Osteoarthritis,” Biomed Res. Int., vol. 2020, pp. 1–12, 2020.
A. Bateman, “UniProt: A worldwide hub of protein knowledge,” Nucleic Acids Res., vol. 47, no. D1, pp. D506–D515, 2019.
J. Barletto Sousa Barros, R. da Silva Santos, and A. Adamski da Silva Reis, “Implication of the MAPK Signalling Pathway in the Pathogenesis of Diabetic Nephropathy,” EMJ Diabetes, no. November, pp. 107–114, 2019.
M. A. Kurauti, G. M. Soares, C. Marmentini, G. A. Bronczek, R. C. S. Branco, and A. C. Boschero, “Insulin and aging,” Vitam. Horm., vol. 115, pp. 185–219, Jan. 2021.
Y. Poloz and V. Stambolic, “Obesity and cancer, a case for insulin signaling,” Cell Death Dis., vol. 6, no. 12, pp. e2037-11, 2015.
V. Balaji, W. Pokrzywa, and T. Hoppe, “Ubiquitylation Pathways In Insulin Signaling and Organismal Homeostasis,” BioEssays, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1–10, 2018.
M. M. Chen et al., “Xanthine dehydrogenase rewires metabolism and the survival of nutrient deprived lung adenocarcinoma cells by facilitating UPR and autophagic degradation,” Int. J. Biol. Sci., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 772–788, 2023.
S. Mubeen, C. T. Hoyt, A. Gemünd, M. Hofmann-Apitius, H. Fröhlich, and D. Domingo-Fernández, “The Impact of Pathway Database Choice on Statistical Enrichment Analysis and Predictive Modeling,” Front. Genet., vol. 10, no. November, pp. 1–13, 2019.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Integrasi data Protein-Protein Interactions dan Pathway untuk Menentukan Score pada pathway Menggunakan Analisis Graf
ARTICLE HISTORY
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Lailan Sahrina Hasibuan, Ahmad Fariqi, Lilik Prayitno, Melly Br Bangun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
