Klasifikasi Tingkat Kepuasan Penggunaan Layanan Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Decision Tree


Authors

  • Devy Fatmawati Universitas Budi Luhur, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Wulan Trisnawati Universitas Budi Luhur, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Yuwan Jumaryadi Universtias Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Gandung Triyono Universitas Budi Luhur, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v3i6.803

Keywords:

Decision Tree; Naive Bayes; Satisfaction; Service; Survey

Abstract

In order to improve the management of IT services, it is necessary to analyze the satisfaction of service users. One of the determinations of quality service performance is determined from the satisfaction with the service felt by its users. The results of the user satisfaction analysis were carried out by analyzing the results of the Pusintek IT service user satisfaction survey. The Pusintek IT service user satisfaction survey will be conducted for all service users in 2022 using 5 (five) service quality indicators, namely tangible, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. The survey results that have been obtained will then be analyzed using a Decision Tree. Based on the results of the tests performed, the accuracy of the decision tree was 98.10% and Naïve Bayes was 97.95%, while for the recall decision tree was 99.51% and Naive Bayes was 98.78%. However, for the level of precision naive bayes, it is better than the decision tree, where the precision naive bayes is 99.02% and the decision tree is 98.47%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. T. S. Kaihatu, Manajemen Komplain. CV. Andi Offset, 2015.

Fattya Ariani and Andi Taufik, “Perbandingan Metode Klasifikasi Data Mining untuk Prediksi Tingkat Kepuasan Pelanggan Telkomsel Prabayar,” SATIN - Sains dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 46–55, 2020, doi: 10.33372/stn.v6i2.666.

B. Tarhini and D. Hayek, “Business Revolution in a Digital Era,” in 14th International Conference on Business Excellence, 2020, p. 405.

J. Wang, J. Y. Lai, and Y. H. Lin, “Social media analytics for mining customer complaints to explore product opportunities,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 178, no. January, p. 109104, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109104.

R. Mardiyanto and M. Ismowati, “Analisis Indeks Kepuasan Masyarakat Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kepuasan Kualitas Pelayanan Masyarakat Di Kantor Kecamatan Kotabaru Kabupaten Karawang,” Transparansi J. Ilm. Ilmu Adm., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 184–197, 2018, doi: 10.31334/trans.v9i2.23.

Suherman, D. Maulana, and V. Mustikaningtyas, “Penerapan Data Mining untuk Klasifikasi Kepuasan Pelanggan Transportasi Online (Ojek Online) Menggunakan Algoritma C4.5,” Pros. SAINTEK Sains dan Teknol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 165–175, 2022.

S. Kim and H. S. Kim, “A Study on the Effect of Medical Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction during COVID-19 for Foreigners in Korea,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1–12, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15075953.

J. J. Purnama, H. M. Nawawi, S. Rosyida, Ridwansyah, and Risandar, “Klasifikasi Mahasiswa Her Berbasis Algortima SVM Dan Decision Tree,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1253–1260, 2020, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.202073080.

A. Budiyantara, I. Irwansyah, E. Prengki, P. A. Pratama, and N. Wiliani, “Komparasi Algoritma Decision Tree, Naive Bayes Dan K-Nearest Neighbor Untuk Memprediksi Mahasiswa Lulus Tepat Waktu,” JITK (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetah. dan Teknol. Komputer), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 265–270, 2020, doi: 10.33480/jitk.v5i2.1214.

S. Zaki, N. I. Ghali, A. Abo-Elfetoh, and A. M. Idrees, “Predictive Analysis of Big data in Egypt Census 2017 Comparison of Four ML Predictive Models,” SSRN Electron. J., pp. 1–10, 2022, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4225813.

Y. A. Alsariera, Y. Baashar, G. Alkawsi, A. Mustafa, A. A. Alkahtani, and N. Ali, “Assessment and Evaluation of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Student Performance,” Comput. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/4151487.

H. Azis, P. Purnawansyah, F. Fattah, and I. P. Putri, “Performa Klasifikasi K-NN dan Cross Validation Pada Data Pasien Pengidap Penyakit Jantung,” Ilk. J. Ilm., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 81–86, 2020, doi: 10.33096/ilkom.v12i2.507.81-86.

A. H. D. Purwanto, M. Nashar, Y. Jumaryadi, W. Wibowo, and A. Mekaniwati, “Improving medium small micro enterprise’(MSME) performance,” Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 37–46, May 2022, doi: 10.21833/ijaas.2022.05.005.

Q. Guo, C. Minghua, D. Yueli, An Du, and Y. Linlei, “Prediction of students’ course failure based on campus card data,” in Proceedings - 2019 International Conference on Robots and Intelligent System, ICRIS 2019, 2019, pp. 361–364. doi: 10.1109/ICRIS.2019.00097.

D. Y. Putri, R. Andreswari, and M. A. Hasibuan, “Analysis of Students Graduation Target Based on Academic Data Record Using C4.5 Algorithm Case Study: Information Systems Students of Telkom University,” in The 6th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM 2018), 2018, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/CITSM.2018.8674366.

B. Deta and T. Mauritsius, “Implementation of Data Mining to Determine Student Majors Using The Machine Learning,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 100, no. 11, pp. 3798–3809, 2022.

E. N. Fitri, S. Winarno, F. Budiman, A. Rohmani, J. Zeniarja, and E. Sugiarto, “Decision Tree Simplification Through Feature Selection Approach In Selecting Fish Feed Sellers,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 301–309, 2023.

D. Chicco and G. Jurman, “The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) should replace the ROC AUC as the standard metric for assessing binary classification,” BioData Min., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13040-023-00322-4.

F. Sutomo et al., “Optimization Of The K-Nearest Neighbors Algorithm Using The Elbow Method On Stroke Prediction,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 125–130, 2023.

N. W. Wardani and N. K. Ariasih, “Analisa Komparasi Algoritma Decision Tree C4.5 dan Naïve Bayes untuk Prediksi Churn Berdasarkan Kelas Pelanggan Retail,” Int. J. Nat. Sci. Eng., vol. 3, no. 3, p. 103, 2019, doi: 10.23887/ijnse.v3i3.23113.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Klasifikasi Tingkat Kepuasan Penggunaan Layanan Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Decision Tree

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY


Published: 2023-06-24
Abstract View: 1165 times
PDF Download: 1103 times

How to Cite

Fatmawati, D., Trisnawati, W., Jumaryadi, Y., & Triyono, G. (2023). Klasifikasi Tingkat Kepuasan Penggunaan Layanan Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Decision Tree. KLIK: Kajian Ilmiah Informatika Dan Komputer, 3(6), 1056-1062. https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v3i6.803

Issue

Section

Articles