Deteksi Gaya Belajar Siswa SMA pada Virtual Based Learning Environment(VBLE) dengan Decision Tree C4.5 dan Naive Bayes


Authors

  • Aang Darmawan Universitas Islam Madura, Pamekasan, Indonesia
  • Kurdianto Universitas Islam Madura, Pamekasan, Indonesia
  • Bakir Universitas Islam Madura, Pamekasan, Indonesia
  • Masdukil Makruf Universitas Islam Madura, Pamekasan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v3i5.760

Keywords:

Decision tree; Naïve bayes; Machine learning; Student Learning Style; Virtual-Based Learning Environment

Abstract

A Detection or identification of student learning styles has a significant role in improving the teaching and learning process. Teachers who are aware of the diverse learning styles of their students can make learning adaptations or prepare learning instructions appropriately, while students who are aware of their learning styles can adapt their learning methods so as to produce better learning process outcomes. However, detecting student learning styles is complex and challenging and there are various factors that can affect the accuracy of detection. Various literature studies on detecting student learning styles note that there are various problems that occur in Virtual Based Learning Education (VBLE), namely the lack of investigations regarding the suitability of teaching and learning styles making it difficult to increase student learning motivation, the traditional instructions of some teachers which are still in conflict with the student learning style system so that it is difficult to adapt to the learning environment and most students do not know effective learning and do not pay the necessary attention to their learning style. This study aims at two (2) things, the first is to detect the learning styles of private high school students (SMAS) in VBLE with the Decision Tree (DT) C4.5 and Naive Bayes (NB) algorithms and the second is to compare the performance of DT and NB algorithms for the context of style detection. private high school students study on VBLE. Data collection was carried out using a google form questionnaire on 252 respondonce consist of alumni and students through 30 questions about learning styles. Student learning styles are identified as visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. For data analysis, the Google Colab tool is used with Python programming. While the process of evaluating the performance of the algorithm is measured using the parameters accuracy, precision, recall/sensitivity, f-measure and time consumption. The results showed that the DT and NB algorithms were good at predicting SMAS learning styles, but the NB algorithm (98%) was slightly better than the DT algorithm (96%) in terms of accuracy, precision, memory/sensitivity, f-measure, while for time consumption DT (0,00505 seconds) much faster than NB(3,2895 seconds). This research contributes in two (2) ways, first scientifically by testing the DT and NB algorithms for detecting learning styles of SMAS students in the VBLE context and practically providing recommendations to education stakeholders namely teachers, students, student guardians and education policymakers to further pay attention to the detection of student learning styles

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

N. D. S. Chetty, L. Handayani, N. A. Binti Sahabudin, Z. Ali, N. Hamzah, and S. Kasim, “Learning styles and teaching styles determine students’ academic performances,” IJERE, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 610, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20345.

S. T. Sianturi and U. L. Yuhana, “Student Behaviour Analysis To Detect Learning Styles Using Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes, And K-Nearest Neighbor Method In Moodle Learning Management System,” JTS, vol. 33, no. 2, p. 94, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.12962/j20882033.v33i2.13665.

Z. Mehenaoui, Y. Lafifi, and L. Zemmouri, “Learning Behavior Analysis to Identify Learner’s Learning Style based on Machine Learning Techniques,” jucs, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1193–1220, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3897/jucs.81518.

L. X. Li and S. S. Abdul Rahman, “Students’ learning style detection using tree augmented naive Bayes,” R. Soc. open sci., vol. 5, no. 7, p. 172108, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1098/rsos.172108.

A. et all. Sopian, “A Study on Learning Styles among Arabic Language Students at Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malacca Campus,” IOSR-JHSS, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 38–40, 2013, doi: 10.9790/0837-1543840.

A. P. Gilakjani, “A Match or Mismatch Between Learning Styles of the Learners and Teaching Styles of the Teachers,” IJMECS, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 51–60, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.5815/ijmecs.2012.11.05.

D. Hernández-Torrano, S. Ali, and C.-K. Chan, “First year medical students’ learning style preferences and their correlation with performance in different subjects within the medical course,” BMC Med Educ, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 131, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0965-5.

A.-M. L. Villajuan, “Relationship between Learning Styles & Academic Achievement in Mathematics of Grade 8 Students,” IJELS, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1052–1055, 2019, doi: 10.22161/ijels.4419.

R. Nizami, M. Z. Latif, and G. Wajid, “Preferred Learning Styles of Medical and Physiotherapy Students,” Annals KEMU, vol. 23, no. 1, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.21649/akemu.v23i1.1511.

B. L. Garton, A. L. Ball, and J. E. Dyer, “The Academic Performance And Retention Of College Of Agriculture Students,” JAE, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 46–56, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.5032/jae.2002.01046.

F. Bell, “Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning,” IRRODL, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 98, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.902.

A. Sypsas, E. Paxinou, and D. Kalles, “Reviewing inquiry-based learning approaches in virtual laboratory environment for science education,” ICODL, vol. 10, no. 2?, p. 74, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.12681/icodl.2288.

J. Capacho, “Representative Model of the Learning Process in Virtual Spaces Supported by ICT,” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 16, no. 1, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.17718/tojde.82918.

F. Moazami, E. Bahrampour, M. R. Azar, F. Jahedi, and M. Moattari, “Comparing two methods of education (virtual versus traditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: a post-test only design study,” BMC Med Educ, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 45, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-45.

M. S. Hasibuan and R. A. Aziz, “Detection of learning styles with prior knowledge data using the SVM, K-NN and Naïve Bayes algorithms,” J.INFOTEL, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 209–213, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.20895/infotel.v14i3.788.

A. M. Altamimi, M. Azzeh, and M. Albashayreh, “Predicting students’ learning styles using regression techniques,” IJEECS, vol. 25, no. 2, p. 1177, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v25.i2.pp1177-1185.

F. Rasheed and A. Wahid, “Learning style detection in E-learning systems using machine learning techniques,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 174, p. 114774, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114774.

P. Ramírez-Correa, J. Alfaro-Pérez, and M. Gallardo, “Identifying Engineering Undergraduates’ Learning Style Profiles Using Machine Learning Techniques,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 22, p. 10505, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/app112210505.

M. Sani Ibrahim, “LEARNING STYLE DETECTION USING K-MEANS CLUSTERING,” FJS, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 375–381, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.33003/fjs-2020-0403-351.

B. Hmedna, A. El Mezouary, and O. Baz, “A predictive model for the identification of learning styles in MOOC environments,” Cluster Comput, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1303–1328, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10586-019-02992-4.

F. A. Khan, A. Akbar, M. Altaf, S. A. K. Tanoli, and A. Ahmad, “Automatic Student Modelling for Detection of Learning Styles and Affective States in Web Based Learning Management Systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 128242–128262, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2937178.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Deteksi Gaya Belajar Siswa SMA pada Virtual Based Learning Environment(VBLE) dengan Decision Tree C4.5 dan Naive Bayes

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY


Published: 2023-04-30
Abstract View: 645 times
PDF Download: 796 times

Issue

Section

Articles