Kombinasi Metode MOORA dan Rank Order Centroid dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Produk Sepatu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v5i1.1856Keywords:
Combination; MOORA; Election; Recommendations; ROCAbstract
The selection of shoe product suppliers is an important process in the shoe industry, which requires careful consideration to ensure price, quality, availability, and delivery. In addition, the ability of suppliers to adapt to changing market demands and the ability to collaborate in the development of new products are also important factors. The problems that arise are uncertainty in assessing supplier quality and performance, difficulty in comparing supplier alternatives objectively, and difficulty in calculating various relevant criteria thoroughly. This study aims to apply a combination of ROC and MOORA weighting methods in determining the selection of shoe product suppliers so that it becomes a recommendation for companies in choosing the right supplier for the sustainability of the business run by the company. The combination of ROC and MOORA can provide deeper and more thorough insight into the alternatives evaluated. Using this approach, decision makers can address some of the weaknesses of each method simultaneously, resulting in more optimal and measurable decisions. The use of a combination of ROC and MOORA can help organizations in achieving their goals in a more efficient and effective manner. The recommendation for the selection of shoe product suppliers shows the ranking results of each supplier based on the final value of the MOORA and ROC calculations, the ranking results show rank 1 with a value of 0.093 obtained by Supplier F, rank 2 with a value of 0.0827 obtained by Supplier A and Supplier E, and rank 3 with a value of 0.0458 obtained by Supplier H.
Downloads
References
Ö. Karakoç, S. Memi?, and B. Sennaroglu, “A Review of Sustainable Supplier Selection with Decision-Making Methods from 2018 to 2022,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 125, 2023.
A. Ayough, S. B. Shargh, and B. Khorshidvand, “A new integrated approach based on base-criterion and utility additive methods and its application to supplier selection problem,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 221, p. 119740, 2023.
S. Proboningrum and A. Sidauruk, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Kain Dengan Metode Moora,” JSiI (Jurnal Sist. Informasi), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 2021.
R. R. Oprasto, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pemasok Bahan Baku Menggunakan Metode PROMETHEE,” J. Media Celeb., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 2023.
W. T. Nugroho, S. Supriatin, F. Asharudin, and O. Arifin, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN SUPPLIER PAKAIAN DENGAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING PADA TOKO HENHEN COLLECTION,” Inf. Syst. J., vol. 6, no. 01 SE-, pp. 1–10, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.24076/infosjournal.2023v6i01.1011.
R. P. Rizqika and E. Zuraidah, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Terbaik Dengan Metode Analythical Hierarchy Process Pada PT. Konten Indomedia Pratama,” Resolusi Rekayasa Tek. Inform. dan Inf., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 161–171, 2022.
H. Sulistiani, Setiawansyah, P. Palupiningsih, F. Hamidy, P. L. Sari, and Y. Khairunnisa, “Employee Performance Evaluation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) with PIPRECIA-S Weighting: A Case Study in Education Institution,” in 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS), 2023, pp. 369–373. doi: 10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349017.
Setiawansyah, A. A. Aldino, P. Palupiningsih, G. F. Laxmi, E. D. Mega, and I. Septiana, “Determining Best Graduates Using TOPSIS with Surrogate Weighting Procedures Approach,” in 2023 International Conference on Networking, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (IConNECT), 2023, pp. 60–64. doi: 10.1109/IConNECT56593.2023.10327119.
Z. Zhai, J. F. Martínez, V. Beltran, and N. L. Martínez, “Decision support systems for agriculture 4.0: Survey and challenges,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 170, p. 105256, 2020.
R. Torres-Sanchez, H. Navarro-Hellin, A. Guillamon-Frutos, R. San-Segundo, M. C. Ruiz-Abellón, and R. Domingo-Miguel, “A decision support system for irrigation management: Analysis and implementation of different learning techniques,” Water, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 548, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020548.
Y. S. Bagi, S. Suyono, and M. F. Tomatala, “Decision support system for high achieving students selection using AHP and TOPSIS,” in 2020 2nd international conference on cybernetics and intelligent system (ICORIS), 2020, pp. 1–5.
R. R. Purba, M. Mesran, M. T. A. Zaen, S. Setiawansyah, D. Siregar, and E. W. Ambarsari, “Decision Support System in the Best Selection Coffee Shop with TOPSIS Method,” IJICS (International J. Informatics Comput. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 28–34, 2023.
C. S. Dhanalakshmi, M. Mathew, and P. Madhu, “Biomass material selection for sustainable environment by the application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA),” in Materials, Design, and Manufacturing for Sustainable Environment: Select Proceedings of ICMDMSE 2020, 2021, pp. 345–354. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-9809-8_28.
A. I. Lubis, P. Sihombing, and E. B. Nababan, “Comparison SAW and MOORA Methods with Attribute Weighting Using Rank Order Centroid in Decision Making,” in 2020 3rd International Conference on Mechanical, Electronics, Computer, and Industrial Technology (MECnIT), 2020, pp. 127–131. doi: 10.1109/MECnIT48290.2020.9166640.
H. Wang et al., “Multi-objective optimization of a hydrogen-fueled Wankel rotary engine based on machine learning and genetic algorithm,” Energy, vol. 263, p. 125961, 2023.
M. Fan, Y. Li, J. Shen, K. Jin, and J. Shi, “Multi-objective optimization design of recycled aggregate concrete mixture proportions based on machine learning and NSGA-II algorithm,” Adv. Eng. Softw., vol. 192, p. 103631, 2024.
P. Dauni, A. Wahana, F. Anjani, and K. Manaf, “Recommendation for giving loans using the Multi Objective Optimization method based on Ratio Analysis,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, vol. 1098, no. 3, p. 32096.
Q. Wu, X. Liu, J. Qin, L. Zhou, A. Mardani, and M. Deveci, “An integrated multi-criteria decision-making and multi-objective optimization model for socially responsible portfolio selection,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 184, p. 121977, 2022.
L. Zhang and P. Lin, “Multi-objective optimization for limiting tunnel-induced damages considering uncertainties,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 216, p. 107945, 2021.
M. A. Hatefi, “An Improved Rank Order Centroid Method (IROC) for Criteria Weight Estimation: An Application in the Engine/Vehicle Selection Problem,” Informatica, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 249–270, 2023.
A. M. N. C. Ribeiro, D. F. H. Sadok, M. E. da Cruz Brito, Á. de Araújo Cavalcanti, P. T. Endo, and J. Kelner, “Comparative analysis of current transducers for development of smart plug through rank order centroid method,” IEEE Lat. Am. Trans., vol. 18, no. 01, pp. 147–155, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TLA.2020.9049472.
R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Metode Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Laboratorium Menggunakan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC),” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, 2023.
H. I. Santoso, “Seleksi Penerimaan Programmer Menggunakan Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Method (SMART Method) dan Rank Order Centroid,” J. Inf. Technol. Softw. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 2024.
M. O. Esangbedo, J. Xue, S. Bai, and C. O. Esangbedo, “Relaxed Rank Order Centroid Weighting MCDM Method With Improved Grey Relational Analysis for Subcontractor Selection: Photothermal Power Station Construction,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 2022, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2022.3204629.
F. Mahdi and D. P. Indini, “Penerapan Metode WASPAS dan ROC (Rank Order Centroid) dalam Pengangkatan Karyawan Kontrak,” Bull. Comput. Sci. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 197–202, 2023, doi: 10.47065/bulletincsr.v3i2.232.
D. U. Iswavigra, “Online Shop Recommendations: Decision Support System Based on Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis,” in 2020 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), 2020, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/CITSM50537.2020.9268848.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Kombinasi Metode MOORA dan Rank Order Centroid dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Produk Sepatu
ARTICLE HISTORY
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Siti Fatimah, Temi Ardiansah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
