Analisis Pengaruh Stimultan Penggunaan TikTok dan Instagram terhadap Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa


Authors

  • Nelani Shafatia Zulatifa Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Abdilbar Ainur Ridla Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Galuh Rastika Pratiwi Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Divita Aulia Listyaningsih Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Amallia Putri Octavia Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Atika Rosidah Hamidah Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Harun Al Rosyid Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47065/jieee.v5i2.2872

Keywords:

TikTok; Instagram; Academic Achievement; Correlation; Linear Regression

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the relationship between the use of TikTok (X1) and Instagram (X2) on the academic achievement of Digital Business Undergraduate Program students of the 2022 intake, which is assessed by the average score. The study approach uses a quantitative approach with a questionnaire by 186 participants. The research instrument has been proven valid because all items meet the requirements of Corrected Item-Total Correlation > 0.30, and is reliable with Cronbach's Alpha values X1 = 0.81; X2 = 0.86; and Y = 0.87, respectively. The findings of the analysis indicate that the two independent variables do not contribute significantly to the dependent variable. The Pearson correlation results show r = –0.045 (p = 0.568) on X1 and r = 0.048 (p = 0.548) on X2, which reflects a very weak and statistically insignificant relationship. Partial regression testing using the t-test also confirmed this, with the regression coefficient of X1 being -0.0398 (t = -0.516; p = 0.606) and X2 being -0.0001 (t = -0.001; p = 0.999). Simultaneously, the F-test also indicated that the model was not significant (p > 0.05). The low R-squared value confirmed that X1 and X2 played only a small role in explaining the variation in student GPA. The regression model also met classical assumptions, including freedom from multicollinearity (VIF X1 = 1.18; VIF X2 = 1.17), no heteroscedasticity (p = 0.7829), and a linear relationship, although there were indications of mild autocorrelation (DW = 1.731). These findings confirm that the intensity of TikTok and Instagram use is not the main predictor of academic achievement, so further research is recommended to include other variables such as learning motivation, time management, academic support, quality of the learning environment, self-regulation, and the purpose and type of content consumption to build a more comprehensive academic achievement prediction model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

N. L. A. Mohd Jaffari, N. S. N. Noor Kamaruzzaman, N. S. Abdul Halim, N. A. Rasdan, and M. S. Saripin, “Social Media Use and Academic Performance Among Students at Pahang’s Public Higher Education Institutions: A Correlation Study,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 14, no. 9, 2024, doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i9/22712.

T. Van Cuong, N. T. Khai, T. Z. Oo, and K. Józsa, “The Impact of Social Media Use Motives on Students’ GPA: The Mediating Role of Daily Time Usage,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 3, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030317.

R. Shiraly, A. Roshanfekr, A. Asadollahi, and M. D. Griffiths, “Psychological distress, social media use, and academic performance of medical students: the mediating role of coping style,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 24, no. 1, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05988-w.

M. J. Malik, M. Ahmad, M. R. Kamran, K. Aliza, and M. Z. Elahi, “Student use of social media, academic performance, and creativity: the mediating role of intrinsic motivation,” Interact. Technol. Smart Educ., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 403–415, 2020, doi: 10.1108/ITSE-01-2020-0005.

M. A. Gulzar, M. Ahmad, M. Hassan, and M. I. Rasheed, “How social media use is related to student engagement and creativity: investigating through the lens of intrinsic motivation,” Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 2283–2293, 2022, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2021.1917660.

L. Wang and J. B. ISMAIL KAMAL, “an Analysis of Intrinsic Motivators About the Effect of Social Media Usage on Artistic Creativity in University in China,” Creat. Stud., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 495–518, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2024.20024.

S. Pitcho-Prelorentzos, C. Heckel, and L. Ring, “Predictors of social anxiety among online dating users,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 110, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106381.

N. A. Caporale-Berkowitz, “Let’s teach peer support skills to all college students: Here’s how and why,” J. Am. Coll. Heal., vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 1921–1925, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1841775.

D. Menon and H. R. Meghana, “Unpacking the uses and gratifications of Facebook: A study among college teachers in India,” Comput. Hum. Behav. Reports, vol. 3, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100066.

L. R. Jarron, N. C. Coops, and D. Roeser, “Measuring industrial lumber production using nighttime lights: A focus study on lumber mills in British Columbia, Canada,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 9 September, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273740.

N. Ahmed, J. W. Park, C. Arteaga, and H. Stephen, “Investigation of Progressive Learning within a Statics Course: An Analysis of Performance Retention, Critical Topics, and Active Participation,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 6, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060576.

J. Engel et al., “Personality dimensions of compulsive sexual behavior in the Sex@Brain study,” J. Behav. Addict., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 408–420, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2023.00029.

A. Gambini and I. Lénárt, “Basic geometric concepts in the thinking of in-service and pre-service mathematics teachers,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 7, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070350.

F. Wang, L. Chen, S. Chen, H. Chen, and Y. Liu, “Characterization of two closely related citrus cultivars using UPLC-ESI-MS/MS-based widely targeted metabolomics,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 7 July, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254759.

M. Gillebaart and F. M. Kroese, “‘Don’t Mind If I Do’: The Role of Behavioral Resistance in Self-Control’s Effects on Behavior,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00396.

A. Cadonna, S. Frühwirth-Schnatter, and P. Knaus, “Triple the gamma—a unifying shrinkage prior for variance and variable selection in sparse state space and TVP models,” Econometrics, vol. 8, no. 2, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics8020020.

M. K. Islam, T. Sostaric, L. Y. Lim, K. Hammer, and C. Locher, “Development of an HPTLC-based dynamic reference standard for the analysis of complex natural products using Jarrah honey as test sample,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 7 July, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254857.

I. C. Álvarez, J. Barbero, and J. L. Zofío, “A data envelopment analysis toolbox for matlab,” J. Stat. Softw., vol. 95, pp. 1–49, 2020, doi: 10.18637/jss.v095.i03.

S. Sosa, D. M. P. Jacoby, M. Lihoreau, and C. Sueur, “Animal social networks: Towards an integrative framework embedding social interactions, space and time,” Methods Ecol. Evol., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 4–9, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.08.009.

N. Roustaei, “Application and interpretation of linear-regression analysis,” Med. Hypothesis, Discov. Innov. Ophthalmol., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 151–159, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.51329/mehdiophthal1506.

X. Lu, “Optimizing learning: A Meta?Analysis of Time Management Strategies in University Education,” PUPIL Int. J. Teaching, Educ. Learn., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 91–111, 2024, doi: 10.20319/pijtel.2024.82.91111.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Analisis Pengaruh Stimultan Penggunaan TikTok dan Instagram terhadap Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY


Published: 2025-12-31
Abstract View: 54 times
PDF Download: 25 times

Most read articles by the same author(s)