MCDM Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory and PIPRECIA in Customer Loan Eligibility Recommendations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47065/jieee.v3i2.1628Keywords:
Customer; Loan Eligibility; MAUT; PIPRECIA; RecommendationsAbstract
Customer loan eligibility recommendations are an important step in the risk and financial assessment process. To ensure business continuity and customer satisfaction, it is important for financial institutions to consider several key factors. Problems in determining lending include various aspects that include credit risk that is difficult to assess appropriately, insufficient information about potential borrowers, potential fraud that can harm lenders. Regardless, financial institutions must ensure sound risk management and comply with applicable regulations and compliance standards to minimize potential losses and maintain fairness in decision-making related to lending. Cooperatives act as institutions that provide access to loans with more flexible terms than conventional financial institutions. The loan application process involves evaluating the customer's eligibility, which includes an analysis of financial condition, credit history, and repayment capacity. The contribution of this study provides a recommendation for savings and loan cooperatives in lending to customers using a decision support system model. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare customer loan feasibility using a combination of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods, namely Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) and Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA). This study aims to determine the ability of both methods to provide a comprehensive understanding of loan feasibility by considering a number of relevant criteria. The results of the customer loan eligibility rating recommend rank 1 with a final value of 0.5127 obtained by Customer K, rank 2 with a final value of 0.432 obtained by Customer I, and rank 3 with a final value of 0.3559 obtained by Customer F.
Downloads
References
M. Nitani and N. Legendre, “Cooperative lenders and the performance of small business loans,” J. Bank. Financ., vol. 128, p. 106125, 2021.
R. Katula and S. Kiriinya, “Loan repayment and financial performance of deposit taking savings and credit cooperative societies in Embu County, Kenya,” Int. J. Curr. Asp. Financ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 102–118, 2018.
H. K. Chan, X. Sun, and S.-H. Chung, “When should fuzzy analytic hierarchy process be used instead of analytic hierarchy process?,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 125, p. 113114, 2019.
T. Limbong et al., Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Metode & Implementasi. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.
D. Nofriansyah, Konsep Data Mining Vs Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. 2015.
A. Herdiansyah, J. F. Andry, S. Setiawansyah, Y. M. Kristania, and S. Sintaro, Sistem pendukung keputusan strategis menggunakan ranking methods. Bandar Lampung: CV. Keranjang Teknologi Media.
S. Xu, T. Yeyao, and M. Shabaz, “Multi-criteria decision making for determining best teaching method using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process,” Soft Comput., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2795–2807, 2023.
N. H. Phan, N. N. Vu, S. Shirguppikar, N. T. Ly, N. C. Tam, and B. T. Tai, “Multi-criteria decision making in electrical discharge machining with nickel coated aluminium electrode for titanium alloy using preferential selection index,” Manuf. Rev., vol. 9, p. 13, 2022.
M. Yazdani, P. Zarate, E. Kazimieras Zavadskas, and Z. Turskis, “A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems,” Manag. Decis., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 2501–2519, 2019.
Ž. Stevi?, E. Durmi?, M. Gaji?, D. Pamu?ar, and A. Puška, “A novel multi-criteria decision-making model: interval rough SAW method for sustainable supplier selection,” Information, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 292, 2019.
D. D. Trung, “Application of TOPSIS and PIV methods for multi-criteria decision making in hard turning process,” J. Mach. Eng., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 57–71, 2021.
N. Nuroji, “Penerapan Multi-Attribute Utility Theory ( MAUT ) Dalam Penentuan Pegawai Terbaik,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 46–53, 2022.
A. D. Wahyudi and A. F. O. Pasaribu, “Metode SWARA dan Multi Attribute Utility Theory Untuk Penentuan Pemasok Pakan Ikan Terbaik,” J. Media Jawadwipa, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 26–37, 2023.
Z. Allah Bukhsh, I. Stipanovic, and A. G. Doree, “Multi-year maintenance planning framework using multi-attribute utility theory and genetic algorithms,” Eur. Transp. Res. Rev., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2020.
A. Q. Maharani and T. Ardiansah, “Kombinasi Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory dan Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment Dalam Penentuan Lulusan Terbaik,” J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2074–2086, 2023.
D. Stanujkic, D. Karabasevic, G. Popovic, and C. Sava, “Simplified pivot pairwise relative criteria importance assessment (PIPRECIA-S) method,” Rom. J. Econ. Forecast., vol. 24, no. 4, p. 141, 2021.
H. B. Santoso, “Metode Pembobotan Simplified Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment dan COPRAS Dalam Penentuan Seleksi Penerimaan Guru,” J. Artif. Intell. Technol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 154–163, 2023.
N. E. Rumahorbo, K. Erwansyah, T. Tugiono, and Z. Lubis, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Kelayakan Penerima Pinjaman Pada Kelompok Tani Menggunakan Metode ComplexProportional Assessment (COPRAS),” J. Cyber Tech, vol. 1, no. 1, 2021.
M. Bobbi, K. Nasution, S. Suryadi, and A. Karim, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Rekomendasi Kelayakan nasabah Penerima Kredit Menerapkan Metode MOORA dan MOOSRA,” vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1284–1292, 2022.
K. Harefa, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Pemberian Pinjaman dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” J. Inform. Univ. Pamulang, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 136–145.
S. Sonang, A. T. Purba, and V. M. M. Siregar, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Pemberian Pinjaman Kredit Menggunakan Metode Topsis Pada Cum Caritas Hkbp Pematangsiantar,” J. Tekinkom (Teknik Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2020.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel MCDM Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory and PIPRECIA in Customer Loan Eligibility Recommendations
ARTICLE HISTORY
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Setiawansyah, Sanriomi Sintaro, Ahmad Ari Aldino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
