Development of Study Program Performance Assessment Application Using SCRUM Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v4i1.1113Keywords:
SCRUM; Performance Assessment; Development ApplicationAbstract
This research aims to develop an innovative and efficient application for study program performance assessment to monitor and improve higher education's academic and management quality. The development method used is Scrum within a flexible and adaptive Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) framework. The application includes features such as lecturer performance survey by students, lecturer and course evaluation, student achievement archive, lecturer attendance monitoring, and research management. The data collected from this application provides comprehensive insights for data-driven decision-making in academic management. The results show that using the Scrum method provides significant benefits by increasing the efficiency of performance management, simplifying administrative processes, and increasing student participation in providing feedback. The application also increases transparency and accountability among lecturers, teaching staff, and students. The successful application of Scrum in developing this application influenced positive outcomes, including the efficiency and transparency of academic evaluation. User trials showed a positive response, with approximately 92% of users finding the application interface easy to navigate and informative. Lecturers also reported the app's help in monitoring student progress. These results confirm the app's potential to support informative decision-making and enhance the learning experience in an academic environment
Downloads
References
K. S. Double, J. A. McGrane, and T. N. Hopfenbeck, “The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies,” Educ Psychol Rev, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 481–509, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3.
K. Wang, B. Li, T. Tian, N. Zakuan, and P. Rani, “Evaluate the drivers for digital transformation in higher education institutions in the era of industry 4.0 based on decision-making method,” Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, vol. 8, no. 3, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2023.100364.
D. J. C. Sihombing, “Academic Data Warehouse Modeling in Higher Education Using Nine-Step Design Methodology,” Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, vol. 4, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v4i4.399.
E. Kurilovas and S. Kubilinskiene, “Computers in Human Behavior Lithuanian case study on evaluating suitability , acceptance and use of IT tools by students – An example of applying Technology Enhanced Learning Research methods in Higher Education,” vol. 107, no. January, 2020, doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106274.
M. Nermend, S. Singh, and U. S. Singh, “An evaluation of decision on paradigm shift in higher education by digital transformation,” in Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier B.V., 2022, pp. 1959–1969. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.255.
J. Wang and J. Conwell, “Higher education and health at midlife: Evaluating the role of college quality,” SSM Popul Health, vol. 19, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101228.
J. Petchamé, I. Iriondo, O. Korres, and J. Paños-Castro, “Digital transformation in higher education: A qualitative evaluative study of a hybrid virtual format using a smart classroom system,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 6, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16675.
J. L. R. Muñoz et al., “Systematic Review of Adaptive Learning Technology for Learning in Higher Education,” Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, vol. 2022, no. 98, pp. 221–233, 2022, doi: 10.14689/ejer.2022.98.014.
S. Chantit and I. Essebaa, “Towards an automatic model-based scrum methodology,” in Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier B.V., 2021, pp. 797–802. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.099.
S. Daud, Z. Mustafa, N. R. Mohd Suradi, A. K. Ariffin, N. R. Abu Bakar, and R. Ramli, “Compliance to thesis examination procedure in the ISO quality management system for teaching and learning,” in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, pp. 18–23. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.004.
M. Kumar, K. Bajaj, B. Sharma, and S. Narang, “A Comparative Performance Assessment of Optimized Multilevel Ensemble Learning Model with Existing Classifier Models,” Big Data, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 371–387, 2021, doi: 10.1089/big.2021.0257.
C. Mio, A. Costantini, and S. Panfilo, “Performance measurement tools for sustainable business: A systematic literature review on the sustainability balanced scorecard use,” Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 367–384, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1002/csr.2206.
A. Adensamer, R. Gsenger, and L. D. Klausner, “‘Computer says no’: Algorithmic decision support and organisational responsibility,” Journal of Responsible Technology, vol. 7–8, p. 100014, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jrt.2021.100014.
I. Fahmi and H. Ali, “DETERMINATION OF CAREER PLANNING AND DECISION MAKING: ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATION SKILLS, MOTIVATION AND EXPERIENCE (LITERATURE REVIEW HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT),” vol. 3, no. 5, 2022, doi: 10.31933/dijms.v3i5.
J. Udvaros, N. Forman, and S. M. Avornicului, “Agile Storyboard and Software Development Leveraging Smart Contract Technology in Order to Increase Stakeholder Confidence,” Electronics (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 2, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/electronics12020426.
T. Clement, N. Kemmerzell, M. Abdelaal, and M. Amberg, “XAIR: A Systematic Metareview of Explainable AI (XAI) Aligned to the Software Development Process,” Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, vol. 5, no. 1. MDPI, pp. 78–108, Mar. 01, 2023. doi: 10.3390/make5010006.
J. Leong, K. May Yee, O. Baitsegi, L. Palanisamy, and R. K. Ramasamy, “Hybrid Project Management between Traditional Software Development Lifecycle and Agile Based Product Development for Future Sustainability,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 1121, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15021121.
V. Pérez-Piqueras, P. Bermejo, and J. A. Gámez, “ProjectION: A computational intelligence-based tool for decision support in agile software development projects,” 2023, doi: 10.22541/au.167575146.62025490/v1.
M. Ahmed, S. U. R. Khan, and K. A. Alam, “An NLP-based quality attributes extraction and prioritization framework in Agile-driven software development,” Automated Software Engineering, vol. 30, no. 1, May 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10515-022-00371-9.
A. Mishra and Y. I. Alzoubi, “Structured software development versus agile software development: a comparative analysis,” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13198-023-01958-5.
R. Santos et al., “A Comparative Analysis of Agile Teamwork Quality Instruments in Agile Software Development: A Qualitative Approach”, doi: 10.18293/DMSVIVA2023-217.
K. Vaid and U. Ghose, “Predictive Analysis of Manpower Requirements in Scrum Projects Using Regression Techniques,” in Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier B.V., 2020, pp. 335–344. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.06.039.
D. J. C. Sihombing and F. Ferdiando, “Analysis of The Implementation of SCRUM in The Development of A BBLobster Content Management System,” Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 15–30, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v5i1.411.
A. A. Cucola? and D. Russo, “The impact of working from home on the success of Scrum projects: A multi-method study,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 197, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.111562.
A. A. Cucola? and D. Russo, “The impact of working from home on the success of Scrum projects: A multi-method study,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 197, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.111562.
K. J. Bin et al., “Building an outpatient telemedicine care pilot using scrum-like framework within a medical residency program,” Clinics, vol. 76, 2021, doi: 10.6061/CLINICS/2021/E2795.
M. A. Dewi and R. Irham, “Penerapan Agile Scrum Pada Pengembangan Aplikasi Bimbingan Daring Skripsi Mahasiswa,” vol. 4, no. 2, Mar. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.47970/siskom-kb.v4i2.195.
S. Shafiee, Y. Wautelet, L. Hvam, E. Sandrin, and C. Forza, “The Journal of Systems & Software Scrum versus Rational Unified Process in facing the main challenges of product configuration systems development,” J Syst Softw, vol. 170, p. 110732, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110732.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Development of Study Program Performance Assessment Application Using SCRUM Method
ARTICLE HISTORY
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Denny Jean Cross Sihombing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
